 |
'One in three shells didn't explode' |
 |
In the Belgian army bomb-disposal unit, the First World War and its
leftovers are daily realities |
 |
By Alan Freeman |
 |
POPERINGE, BELGIUM -- Just last month, farmer Noel St-Germain
spotted several rusty mortar shells on a muddy field outside this
town in southern Belgium. He called the police, which got in touch
with the Belgian army's bomb-disposal unit. |
 |
By the time the bomb squad had dug a couple of metres into the
Flanders field, it had uncovered a storage site containing no fewer
than 1,100 eight-centimetre British shells, originally destined for
the front lines but sitting undisturbed since the end of the First
World War -- more than eight decades ago. |
 |
"Every year, we find at least one storage site like this," said
Captain Luc Moerman, a company commander for DOVO, the Belgian
army's Service for the Disposal and Destruction of Explosive
Devices. |
 |
In Canada, the 1914-18 war is the stuff of history books and annual
Remembrance Day ceremonies, but in the former battlefields of
Belgium and northern France, the war remains a daily reality and an
occasional danger. |
 |
Squads of DOVO's 150 bomb-disposal experts regularly fan out through
the Belgian countryside, answering some of the 3,000 calls the
service receives annually to pick up unexploded grenades, mortar
shells and other ordnance -- the vast majority from the First World
War. |
 |
Estimates are that no fewer than 1.5 billion projectiles were
shipped to the front lines during the war. But millions were not
fired, and millions more failed to blow up because of shoddy
production techniques. |
 |
"We know one in three shells didn't explode," Capt. Moerman said.
DOVO collected 300 tonnes of unexploded ordnance last year. |
 |
Shells still occasionally explode, killing or injuring those who
handle them. Sometimes these people are curious civilians, but
professionals are also at risk. Two French disposal experts were
killed at Vimy in 1998 when a shell exploded, and four Belgian
experts died in an explosion in 1986. |
 |
Last weekend, across the border in France, 12,000 people were
evacuated over a three-kilometre zone around the town of Vimy after
officials determined that a stockpile of shells could explode and
spread toxic gas fumes. Residents will likely not be allowed back in
their homes until this weekend. |
 |
The Vimy site contained 173 tonnes of munitions -- 16,000
projectiles, most of them filled with phosgene and mustard gas,
much-feared poison gases that attack eyes, skin and lungs, causing
irritation, blistering and even death. |
 |
Disposal is relatively simple with standard ordnance, such as the
shells in Mr. St-Germain's field. They were transported to DOVO's
base at Poelkapelle to be destroyed in a controlled explosion. |
 |
Disposal is more difficult with gas shells and their deadly fumes.
They used to be encased in concrete and dumped at sea, but that
practice is now illegal under terms of an international convention
on chemical warfare. Belgium stopped ocean dumping in 1980. |
 |
Belgian officials say they are years ahead of the French in dealing
with this unwanted legacy of war, particularly when it comes to gas
shells. At Poelkapelle (just a couple of kilometres from St. Julien,
where 2,000 Canadians died in a German gas attack in April, 1915),
Belgium has opened a $25-million disposal facility that can deal
with most kinds of gas shells. There is nothing of its kind in
France. |
 |
According to Capt. Moerman, about 90 per cent of incoming shells are
easily identified as non-toxic and sent to special outdoor storage
areas where they are placed in crates to await controlled
destruction. Determining which of the remainder are gas shells can
be tricky. |
 |
Suspect shells are thoroughly cleaned of rust and X-rayed for liquid
content, an indication they are capable of producing toxic gas. |
 |
In the next sensitive step, a robotic drill makes a hole in the
shell at a spot above the liquid and below the explosive in the tip. |
 |
"We don't want to drill into the explosive because we risk an
explosion, and we don't want to drill into the toxic material
because we risk contaminating the installation," Capt. Moerman said. |
 |
A small quantity of the liquid is extracted through the hole and a
lab determines its exact chemical makeup. |
 |
Robotic equipment then lops off the top of the shell and the
contents are poured into one of three separate barrels, depending on
the chemical composition. |
 |
The barrels are sent to a licensed facility, where the chemicals are
burned and destroyed at high temperatures. |
 |
The process is incredibly time-consuming. |
 |
In its two years of operation, the facility has only disposed of
1,000 toxic items. About 25,000 suspect shells are stored at the
site. |
 |
Capt. Moerman said the facility had typical startup problems but now
works more efficiently. |
 |
The goal is to process the backlog within the next five years, he
said, freeing the facility to handle shells as they are brought in. |
 |
Considering that the volume of annual collections has remained
stable for 22 years, Capt. Moerman doesn't worry about running out
of work. |
 |
"We will probably be at this for at least another 22 years. I'll be
on my pension by the time we begin to resolve this problem," the
33-year-old officer said.
|